Cases 41 - 50 of 137
Aloe v. The City of New York
as 21-3114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marlene Aloe
Defendant / Appellee:
The City of New York
Defendant:
The New York City Department of Correction, Cynthia Brann, New York City Department of Correction Commissioner and Correction Officers Jane Does #1-5, Correction Officers as yet unidentified in their official and individual capacities
Tamarez et al v. Hochul et al
as 1:2021cv10678
Plaintiff:
Madelyn Tamarez and Pamela Buchbinder
Defendant:
Kathleen Hochul, Bill De Blasio, Vincent Schiraldi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caraballo v. Pliler et al
as 1:2021cv10476
Plaintiff:
Frank Caraballo
Defendant:
Warden Pliler, Captain Okane, Ms. Elmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caraballo v. Pliler et al
as 9:2021cv01218
Plaintiff:
Frank Caraballo
Defendant:
Pliler, Captain Okane, Elmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Doe
as 1:2021cv09199
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Police Officer "Jane" Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredricks v. Correction Officer John Doe et al
as 1:2021cv08389
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredricks
Defendant:
Correction Officer John Doe, Captain Officer Jane Doe and Medical Professional Doctor John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Jane Doe
as 1:2021cv03803
Plaintiff:
Antonio Tremayne Stokes
Defendant:
Officer Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Doe et al
as 4:2021cv02942
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Ford
Defendant:
Officer Jane Doe and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. DeKalb County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2021cv03548
Plaintiff:
Antonio Stokes
Defendant:
DeKalb County Sheriff's Office and Officer Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabriel v. Hogan et al
as 1:2021cv01762
Plaintiff:
Steven Gabriel
Defendant:
Governor L. Hogan, Lt. Governor B. Rutherford, Secretary S. Moyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
