Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Guarneri v. Clark et al
as 9:2015cv01447
Plaintiff:
Joseph Guarneri
Defendant:
Clark, Craig D. Apple, William C. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Nail et al
as 5:2015cv02449
Plaintiff:
Dan Mitchell
Defendant:
Lonnie Nail, Pamela Renee Hearn, Jerry Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Rimmer v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 15-14257
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT RIMMER
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Babu Kalluvilayil v. Classification Headquarters, et al
as 15-10454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BABU S. KALLUVILAYIL
Defendant - Appellee:
CLASSIFICATION HEADQUARTERS, EDDY WHEELER, Warden, R. LEAL, Assistant Warden and others
Joseph Barrack v. Officer S. Rimmer et al
as 8:2014cv01470
Plaintiff:
Joseph Barrack
Defendant:
City of Costa Mesa, Commander/Chief, Costa Mesa Police Department and others
RIMMER v. NICHOLS et al
as 3:2014cv00155
Plaintiff:
LOUIS ODELL RIMMER
Defendant:
M NICHOLS, D MCGOWAN and W D RUMMEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Bruce v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-15982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT C. BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, RICHARD A. RIMMER, M. RUFF and others
Rimmer v. Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
as 3:2011cv00161
Petitioner:
Charles Stacy Rimmer
Respondent:
Jessie Streeter and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Byron Johnson v. David Runnels, et al
as 11-16697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON EUGENE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID L. RUNNELS, RODERICK HICKMAN, Youth and Adult Correctional Secretary, RICHARD A. RIMMER, Former Director of CDC and others
Stewart v. Rimmer et al
as 3:2011cv00611
Plaintiff:
Daniel Stewart
Defendant:
Jerry Rimmer and Debra Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
