Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Jackson v. Lafler
as 2:2008cv13269
Petitioner:
Steven Jackson
Respondent:
Blaine Lafler
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
SPOTTS et al v. USA et al
as 1:2008cv00376
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Andre Spotts, BILLY AGUERO, MARCUS T. ARNOLD and others
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Thelma Williams, Jr. v. R. Johnson, et al
as 08-2234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thelma Williams, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. Johnson, Lt., Varner Unit, ADC, Joe Page, Lt., Varner Unit, ADC (originally sued as Page), Steven Jackson, Sgt., Varner Unit, ADC (originally sued as Jackson) and others
Thelma Williams, Jr. v. R. Johnson, et al
as 08-1582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thelma Williams, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. Johnson, Lt., Varner Unit, ADC, Joe Page, Lt., Varner Unit, ADC (originally sued as Page), Steven Jackson, Sgt., Varner Unit, ADC (originally sued as Jackson) and others
Jackson v. USA - 2255
as 8:2008cv00087
Petitioner:
Harold Steven Jackson
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jackson v. USA - 2255
as 8:2007cv02793
Petitioner:
Harold Steven Jackson
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Edwards v. Jackson et al
as 5:2007cv00070
Plaintiff:
Carl Edwards, III
Defendant:
Steven Jackson and Richard Currie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hado v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2007cv00415
Plaintiff:
Steven Jackson Hado
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Parties and T C Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jackson v. United States of America
as 8:2007cv01239
Petitioner:
Harold Steven Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
