Cases 41 - 50 of 240
STILES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv05977
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
RAFIK STILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia v. Stiles Unit et al
as 9:2020cv00243
Defendant:
Dr Unknown Brown, D. Wallace, Unknown Newberry and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troy Williams v. Doe, et al
as 20-2041
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T Phone Company Tycoon, Jay Nixon, Former Missouri Governor, Donald W. Hinton, Doctor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Troy Williams
Burleson v. T.D.C.J. - C. I. D. et al
as 4:2020cv01174
Defendant:
Goodman Unit, The State of Texas, T.D.C.J. - C. I. D. and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jedediah Burleson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burleson et al v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2020cv01086
Plaintiff:
Raymond Wilson, Chase Burford, Richard D. Sullivan and others
Defendant:
Henderson Unit, Lablanc Unit, Tarrant County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanous v. UTMB Stiles Unit Medical
as 1:2020cv00382
Plaintiff:
John Vanous
Defendant:
UTMB Stiles Unit Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Stiles v. Baros et al
as 2:2020cv00783
Defendant:
S. Baros and Unknown
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Daniel Stiles and Nicholas Daniel Stiles, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckelew v. Gore et al
as 3:2020cv00585
Defendant:
Patrica Valdovenos, Lt. Buchanan, Deputy Vargas, - and others
Plaintiff:
Dion Scott Buckelew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Stile v. United States of America
as 9:2020cv00368
Respondent:
United States of America and The Northern District of New York Probation
Petitioner:
James Stile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fuller v. Stone County Court et al
as 3:2020cv05030
Plaintiff:
James Allen Fuller
Defendant:
Marsha Stiles and Stone County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
