Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Moore v. Keller et al
as 5:2012ct03249
Plaintiff:
Thomas Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Alvin W. Keller, Jr., Robert Lewis, Michael A. Hardee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. USA
as 6:2012cv03101
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marco Thomas Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Antonio Patterson v. Star Conneley
as 12-7521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO DIEARGO PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STAR CONNELEY, Medical Supervisor, B. J. THOMAS, IGC Grievance, JON OZMINT, Head Director SCDC and others
Defendant:
BILL BYER, New Head Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections, WAYNE MCCABE, Warden and FRED THOMPSON, Assistant Warden
Barton v. Moore et al
as 9:2012cv02151
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Barton
Defendant:
Thomas Moore and William Byars, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore
as 4:2012cv00066
Plaintiff:
Thomas Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. C.D.C.R. et al
as 3:2012cv02516
Plaintiff:
Charlie Jackson
Defendant:
C.D.C.R., Kevin R. Chappell, E. Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Lamas, et al
as 12-2280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
MORIROSA LAMAS, Warden at SCI Rockview, KENNY GRANLUND, Unit Manager and JEFF HORTOR, Deputy Warden
Thomas Moore, Jr. v. Michael Hardee
as 12-6727
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS MOORE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. HARDEE and ALVIN WILLIAM KELLER, JR.
Thomas Moore, Jr. v. Michael Hardee
as 12-6679
Petitioner - Appellee:
THOMAS MOORE, JR.
Respondent - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. HARDEE, ALVIN WILLIAM KELLER, JR. and REUBEN FRANKLIN YOUNG
George Hamilton v. David Tristan, et al
as 12-15501
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID TRISTAN, Former Chief Deputy Director, EDWARD ALAMEIDA, THOMAS MOORE, Former Assistant Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
