Cases 41 - 50 of 150
HARRISON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMAS HARRISON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TRACY JEFFERSON, AHMED HOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Fiorito v. Warden Thomas
as 23-1008
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Fiorito
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Thomas
Black v. BCBIC Officer Elliott et al
as 1:2022cv03315
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Black
Defendant:
BCBIC Officer Elliott, BCBIC Officer Nenyioma and CDF Warden Thomas L Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cassaday v. Scarantino
as 5:2022hc02199
Petitioner:
Kevin W. Cassaday
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gray v. Scarantino
as 5:2022hc02197
Petitioner:
Jaquavius Laquan Gray
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Shelton v. Scarantino
as 5:2022hc02196
Petitioner:
Kenneth E. Shelton
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Palmer v. Watson
as 4:2022cv01958
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Palmer
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carrington v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2022ct03353
Plaintiff:
Theodore Macon Carrington, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Thomas Scarantino, Federal Medical Center and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brewer v. Scarantino
as 5:2022hc02119
Petitioner:
Bryan L. Brewer
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Weeks v. Stewart et al
as 6:2022cv06074
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Deputy Stewart, Rashad Nalls, Litzsey G Everett, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
