Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Carroll v. Pennsylvania Judicial
as 4:2009cv05430
Plaintiff:
Wesley Carroll
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Judicial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wesley Carroll v. U. S. Army Crimes Records Ctr
as 09-7508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY CARROLL, Reverend
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CRIMES RECORDS CENTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1904
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wesley Carroll v. Clerk of Courts, et al
as 09-3318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY CARROLL
Defendant - Appellee:
CLERK OF COURTS, Court of Common Pleas, Allegheny County and COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Wesley Carroll v. Pittsburgh PA Allegheny Co., et al
as 09-5174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wesley Carroll
Defendant - Appellee:
Pittsburgh Pennsylvania Allegheny County Clerk Of Courts, George Matta, II and US Department Of Justice, Programs Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CARROLL v. PITTSBURGH PENNSYLVANIA ALLEGHENY COUNT CLERK, ET AL.
as 1:2009cv00685
Plaintiff:
WESLEY CARROLL
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH PENNSYLVANIA ALLEGHENY COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, GEORGE MATTA, II and US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , PROGRAMS DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
