Cases 41 - 50 of 1,113
PANTZAR v. COUNTY OF LEHIGH et al
as 5:2023cv03024
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN PANTZAR
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LEHIGH, WARDEN KYLE A. RUSSELL, DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS JANINE DONATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pedro Cantero Bonilla v. X. Lam
as 23-12691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO E. CANTERO BONILLA
Defendant / Appellee:
X. LAM
RAMBERT v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv03714
Petitioner:
ERIC X RAMBERT
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Luna v. USA
as 6:2023cv04702
Petitioner:
Angie X Vargas Luna
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
X. v. Yes Care Health et al
as 1:2023cv02024
Plaintiff:
Chris X.
Defendant:
Yes Care Health, Arresahegn Getachen, M.D., Jeff Nines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith Jr. v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv01053
Plaintiff:
David Smith Jr. and David Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, John and Jane Doe I-X and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantero Bonilla v. Lam
as 6:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Pedro E. Cantero Bonilla
Defendant:
Officer X. Lam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAKOTA PHILLIPS
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, GARY HEWETT, M CUMERFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantero Bonilla v. Lam
as 6:2023cv01531
Plaintiff:
Pedro E. Cantero Bonilla
Defendant:
Officer X. Lam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oxendine v. Moose et al
as 5:2023ct03196
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Oxendine
Defendant:
Timothy D. Moose, Todd E. Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
