Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 177
Smith v. Judge Reardon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv08384
Respondent: Judge Reardon and Morris Jacobson
Petitioner: Anthony Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Spearman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv08249
Respondent: Spearman
Petitioner: Anthony Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Pearman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv03683
Respondent: Warden S Pearman
Petitioner: Anthony Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Emberton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00295
Plaintiff: Anthony Smith
Defendant: Van Buren County Jail, Mike Shamoon and Lucas Emberton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Danville Correctional Center
as 2:2019cv02099
Plaintiff: Anthony Smith
Defendant: Danville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dublino v. Auburn Correctional Facility et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2019cv00381
Defendant: Mr. Knapp, Mr. Klepp, Mr. Wheeler and others
Plaintiff: Mark Dublino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Mcbrayer et al
as 1:2019cv01120
Plaintiff: David Anthony Smith
Defendant: Keith Mcbrayer, Mr. M. Dubose, Mr. Clopton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Dozier et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv04995
Defendant: Gregory Dozier, Warden Deloach and Rogers S.P.
Plaintiff: Robert Anthony Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Anderson
as 5:2018cv04073
Plaintiff: Bernard Anthony Smith
Defendant: Lance Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davis et al
as 1:2018cv04756
Plaintiff: Anthony Smith
Defendant: John Does and Major Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?