Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Jordan v. Roman-Marin et al
as 1:2009cv01870
Plaintiff:
James Jordan
Defendant:
R. Roman-Marin, N. Grannis, B Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Ryan et al
as 2:2009cv01777
Plaintiff:
Timothy D Thomas
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, J Freeland, Unknown Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Owens v. Rich Barlow, et al
as 09-2734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frank R. Owens
Defendant - Appellee:
Rich Barlow and Dennis Brumbaugh
Frank Owens v. Donald Mallinger, et al
as 09-2114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frank R. Owens
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald J. Mallinger, Dr. Sanchez, Nurse Julie Pihl and others
HARRIS III v. OSMAN et al
as 3:2009cv01928
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEROY HARRIS III
Defendant:
JOHN OSMAN, M. OLIVER, ROBERT BRUMBAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Kern v. Scott Francik, et al
as 09-1710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert L. Kern
Defendant - Appellee:
Scott Francik, Employed as Correctional Counselor at Anamosa State Penitentiary, John Ault, Employed as Warden (now ex-warden) at Anamosa State Penitentiary, John Fayram, Employed as Deputy Warden at Anamosa State Penitentiary and others
Butler v. Hartlaub et al
as 1:2008cv02240
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Butler
Defendant:
William Hartlaub and John Brumbaugh
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edwards v. O'Brian, et al.,
as 4:2008cv00467
Plaintiff:
William Simpson Edwards
Defendant:
Ed O'Brian, Pradeep Sarswat, Durga Satyavola and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Frank Owens v. Rich Barlow, et al
as 08-2112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frank R. Owens
Defendant - Appellee:
Rich Barlow and Dennis Brumbaugh
REID v. PATRICK et al
as 3:2007cv00334
Plaintiff:
STEVEN REID
Defendant:
GEORGE PATRICK, BRITTON, CORRECTIONAL SECURITY LIEUTENANT BRUMBAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
