Cases 51 - 60 of 109
Thompson v. Bruton, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv01130
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Carnell Thompson
Defendant:
Mark Bruton and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Bruton et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv01101
Plaintiff:
Kareem Young
Defendant:
Mark Bruton and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wesley Johnson v. Theo Glover, et al
as 14-3003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
THEO GLOVER, DEVLIN JOSEPH SCHOOP, GREGORY ROBERT JAMES, JR. and others
Braja Smith v. Brian Owens, et al
as 14-14039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRAJA PANDIT SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, Individually and in his official capacity, ROBERT TOOLE, Individually and in his official capacity, JOHN PAUL, Individually and in his official capacity and others
Mell Bruton v. Tommy Mills, et al
as 14-6029
Petitioner - Appellant:
MELL T. BRUTON
Respondent - Appellee:
TOMMY MILLS and STATE OF TENNESSEE
Flournoy, Michael v. McKenzie, John et al
as 3:2014cv00554
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Flournoy
Defendant:
John G. McKenzie , United States Attorney Office NDI-WD , Thomas G. Bruton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRUTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00519
Petitioner:
JARED BRUTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson, Jr. et al v. Glover et al
as 3:2014cv50129
Plaintiff:
Wesley Johnson, Jr. and Paul A. Mathis
Defendant:
Theo Glover, Devlin J. Schoop, Gregory R. James, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruton v. Casteel et al
as 3:2014cv00610
Plaintiff:
Mell T. Bruton
Defendant:
Michelle Casteel and Lynn Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Owens et al
as 6:2013cv00115
Plaintiff:
Braja Pandit Smith
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Robert Toole, John Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
