Cases 51 - 60 of 88
Garza v. Wichita County Sheriff's Office et al
as 7:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jerry Joe Garza
Defendant:
Wichita County Sheriff's Office, David Duke and NFN Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abel Rodriguez v. David Duke, et al
as 13-10427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABEL RODRIGUEZ, also known as Domingo Martinez
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID DUKE, Wichita County Sheriff, DR. DANIEL BOLIN, WICHITA COUNTY TEXAS and others
Harris v. Wichita County, Texas et al
as 7:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Harris
Defendant:
Wichita County, Texas, Wichita County Sheriff Office, David Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Corrections Corporation of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00429
Plaintiff:
Donna L Johnson
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Inc. , Witchita County, Texas Sheriff's Office , David Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Duke et al
as 7:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Harris
Defendant:
David Duke, John Doe and Contracted Medical Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 12-7070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, BEVERLY PERDUE, Governor, MELANIE A. SHEKITA and others
Wallace v. Hamm et al
as 1:2012cv00073
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Wallace
Defendant:
Kim Hamm, Craig C. Hensel, Robert R. Spoja and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William McGrew v. David Duke
as 12-10167
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM MCGREW
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID DUKE, Wichita County Sheriff
McGrew v. Duke
as 3:2011cv03559
Respondent:
David Duke
Petitioner:
William McGrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2011ct03258
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Beverly Perdue, Melanie A. Shekita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
