Cases 51 - 60 of 88
Philip Brown v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.
as 12-56399
Petitioner - Appellant:
PHILIP EDWARD BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
DOMINGO URIBE, Jr., Warden
WINFREY v. BROWN et al
as 2:2012cv00156
Respondent:
EDWARD BROWN and STEVE CARTER
Petitioner:
DUAN WINFREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SISK v. BROWN
as 2:2012cv00021
Defendant:
EDWARD BROWN
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jevon Brown v. Patrick
as 11-7580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEVON EDWARD BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK, Virginia Department of Corrections Officer, C/O, employee for Unit #27, MR. RAGSDALE, Virginia Department of Transportation, Forman, "Crew Virginia", MS. FRANCHER, Virginia Department of Corrections, Unit #27, Medical Care Assistant/Personnel and others
Brown v. Como
as 1:2011cv08091
Plaintiff:
Edward Brown
Defendant:
Andrew Como
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2011cv02885
Plaintiff:
Edward Brown
Defendant:
Shelby County, City of Memphis, TN, William L. Gibbons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2011cv02839
Plaintiff:
Edward Brown
Defendant:
Shelby County, Michele Lynn and The Public Defender Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2011cv02656
Plaintiff:
Edward Brown
Defendant:
Shelby County, City of Memphis, TN, William L. Gibbons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. United States of America, The
as 2:2011cv08026
Petitioner:
Edward Browning McClain
Respondent:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brown v. Ballard et al
as 2:2011cv00417
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Brown
Defendant:
David Ballard and Tim Whittington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
