Cases 51 - 60 of 177
Rodriguez v. N.Y. State Dept. of Parole et al
as 1:2018cv08107
Defendant:
Parole Officer Elvis Ramos, Sergeant Patrie (Patt-Tree), N.Y. State Dept. of Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Fulgencio Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moco v. Janik
as 18-1952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Moco
Defendant - Appellee:
J.M. Janik, Corrections Officer, New York State Department of Corrections, New York State Department of Corrections, Medical (Gowanda) and others
WRIGHT v. SHIPE et al
as 1:2018cv00118
Plaintiff:
CODY WRIGHT
Defendant:
SHIPE, J.M. BEATTY and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Johnson et al
as 1:2018cv01094
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Eddie T. Johnson, M.N. Brooks and J.M. Malkowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blow v. Harris et al
as 5:2018ct03013
Plaintiff:
Ivan Blow
Defendant:
J.M. Harris and Sgt. Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Swicki
as 17-3449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher J.M Lewis
Defendant - Appellee:
Swicki, Lt., Butkiewicus, Capt. and Stewart, C/O
Crawford v. Baltazar
as 17-3184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carl Dwayne Crawford
Defendant - Appellee:
Warden Juan Baltazar, Individually and in their Official Capacities, Captain Matthew Whinnery, Individually and in their Official Capacities, Lieutenant Robert Poitras, Individually and in their Official Capacities and others
Regassa v. Sanders et al
as 3:2017cv00999
Plaintiff:
Admassu Regassa
Defendant:
K. Sanders, R. Baskerville, C. Krawczyk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Rivera et al
as 3:2017cv00505
Plaintiff:
Christopher J.M. Lewis
Defendant:
Rivera, Beebe, Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Cutter et al
as 6:2017cv00499
Plaintiff:
Irvin Jefferson Wilson
Defendant:
J.M. Cutler, Nicob Ball, B.W. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
