Cases 51 - 60 of 80
Gonzalez v. Ahmed et al
as 5:2010cv05654
Plaintiff:
Brent Luis Gonzalez
Defendant:
Z. Ahmed and Joseph Chudy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. USA
as 2:2010mc01061
Petitioner:
Jorge Luis Gonzalez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Gonzalez v. USA
as 2:2010cv01061
Petitioner:
Jorge Luis Gonzalez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Luis Gonzalez-Cortez
as 10-40980
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LUIS GONZALEZ-CORTEZ
Gonzalez-Rivera v. Matias, et al
as 10-2088
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS LUIS GONZALEZ-RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
JUDITH MATIAS and ROBERTO SANCHEZ-RAMOS
Interested Party:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OF PUERTO RICO
Watson v. Moscicki
as 10-2793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Watson
Defendant - Appellee:
Ronald Moscicki, Superintendent, Lakeview Correctional Facility, R. Moffit, DSA, Lakeview Correctional Facility, Caissley, Dr., Facility Health Services Director, Lakeview Correctional Facility and others
Gonzalez-Rivera v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
as 10-1605
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS LUIS GONZALEZ-RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO
Respondent:
EDGARDO COLOMBA-RIVERA
Gonzalez-Rivera v. Matias, et al
as 10-1375
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS LUIS GONZALEZ-RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
JUDITH MATIAS and ROBERTO SANCHEZ-RAMOS
Interested Party:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO
Quintana-Molina v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2010cv00117
Respondent:
Director for Detention and Removal of Immigration and Customs Enforcement for the El Paso, TX District, Jose Luis Gonzalez, Tom Hillburger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 10-1028
Petitioner - Appellant:
Luis Gonzalez
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
