Cases 51 - 60 of 1,031
Scott v. Malone et al
as 2:2023cv03532
Plaintiff:
Antwon L. Scott
Defendant:
Dan Malone and Tanya M. Duby-Gritzuk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eric Malone v. Kathleen Parsons, et al
as 23-1578
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC MALONE
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHLEEN PARSONS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BEARD, J. JARRAD, Lieutenant and others
Springer v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Randall C. Mathena, H. Scott Richeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Malone, Sr. v. Does, et al
as 23-2387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Dewayne Malone, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Does, Officer Jaimie, Robert Case, Jail Administrator, Greene County, Steve Franks, Sheriff, Greene County and others
Malone v. Shawano County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv00714
Plaintiff:
Matthew Clayton Malone
Defendant:
Shawano County Sheriff's Department and Joshua Heider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Carlos C. Malone and Carlos C Malone
Defendant:
Sheriff Vic Regalado, Tulsa County Sheriffs Office, Undersheriff George Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malone v. Regalado
as 4:2023cv00231
Petitioner:
Carlos C. Malone and Carlos C Malone
Respondent:
Sheriff Vic Regalado and Vic Regalado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chad Malone v. Frank Vanihel
as 23-2098
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHAD MALONE
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANK VANIHEL
Malone v. Zarate et al
as 4:2023cv02652
Plaintiff:
Deshawn P. Malone
Defendant:
A. Zarate, J. Larraux and D. Vaca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malone v. King County Jail
as 2:2023cv00818
Plaintiff:
Winter Lavon Malone
Defendant:
King County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
