Cases 51 - 60 of 264
Bradley v. Sacks et al
as 1:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Deandre Bradley
Defendant:
Stanley Sacks, State of Illinois, Kim Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv01178
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harris
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Florida State Prison, Madison Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Infante v. Williams et al
as 7:2021cv00225
Plaintiff:
Saints Infante
Defendant:
Officer Williams, Officer T. Santana, Officer Sphinx and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suggs v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2021cv00068
Plaintiff:
Stephon W. Suggs
Defendant:
Warden Anthony Caldwell, John Doe, Cert Sgt. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv00898
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TURNER
Defendant:
CAPTAIN JOHNSON, OFFICER WILLIAMS, OFFICER J. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv00889
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TURNER
Defendant:
CAPTAIN JOHNSON, OFFICER J. SMITH, OFFICER WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv00824
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TURNER
Defendant:
CAPTAIN JOHNSON, OFFICER SOUTHERN, OFFICER WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagu v. Crawford et al
as 5:2021cv00572
Plaintiff:
Francisco E. Bagu
Defendant:
Officer K. Crawford, Lt. O. Spradlin, Officer G. Shamblin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hawkins v. St Clair County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv01271
Plaintiff:
Antione Hawkins
Defendant:
St Clair County Jail, Officer Williams, Officer Futrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagu v. Crawford et al
as 3:2021cv00169
Plaintiff:
Francisco E. Bagu
Defendant:
Lt. K. Crawford, Lt. O. Spradlin, Officer G. Shamblin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
