Cases 51 - 60 of 31,863
Dillard v. Etherly et al
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Aaron T Dillard
Defendant:
Marcus Etherly, Kenyon Randle and Monicka Branscomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seibert, Jerrad v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Jerrad T. Seibert
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alfonso v. Travis et al
as 6:2024cv06324
Plaintiff:
Ramon M. Alfonso
Defendant:
Michael Travis, Patrick McCann, Correction Officer Jeremy Comfort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. GOFFINET et al
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
GENTLE THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
LUCY GOFFINET and T. PARKER HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph v. Allen et al
as 3:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Kenel Joseph
Defendant:
David Allen, Michael Collins, T. Clemits and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raybourn v. Centurion Medical Services, et al
as 5:2024cv06072
Plaintiff:
Connie Ann Raybourn
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Chris McBee, Todd Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Etherly et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Aaron T Dillard
Defendant:
Marcus Etherly, Kenyon Randle and Monicka Branscomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tabitha McKenzie v. Chief Judge, et al
as 24-11666
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE, CASEY T. BARREN and LISA TANNER
Tabitha McKenzie v. Chief Judge, et al
as 24-11667
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE, CASEY T. BARREN and LISA TANNER
PERRY v. PHIPPS et al
as 2:2024cv02835
Plaintiff:
RODNEY A. PERRY
Defendant:
Karen Phipps, MIKE E. MORGAN, BLAIR NANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
