Cases 51 - 60 of 71
RIVERA v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2010cv01400
Plaintiff:
FRANK RIVERA
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY A. BEARD, DORENA VARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Treece v. SCDMH et al
as 3:2010cv02354
Plaintiff:
Virgil Treece
Defendant:
SCDMH, Shelly Winston-Wood, PSO Gaither and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Treece v. Buddy Caldwell, et al
as 10-30689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES TREECE
Defendant - Appellee:
BUDDY CALDWELL, State Attorney General, JAMES LEBLANC, Secretary, Department of Corrections, GEO GROUP, Owner of this prison and others
Treece v. Caldwell et al
as 2:2010cv01066
Plaintiff:
Charles A Treece
Defendant:
Buddy Caldwell, James LeBlanc, GEO Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Treece v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2010cv00433
Defendant:
Unknown Allemand, Wayne Calabrese, Buddy Caldwell and others
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Treece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Treece v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2010cv01066
Plaintiff:
Charles A Treece
Defendant:
Buddy Caldwell, James LeBlanc, GEO Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Rivera v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 10-2144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, JEFFREY BEARD, LOUIS FOLINO and others
RIVERA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2010cv00235
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY A. BEARD, TIMOTHY I. MARK and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nigel Reid, Sr. v. Tonia Treece, et al
as 10-5081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NIGEL M. REID, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TONIA TREECE, KATHEY MULLINS, HAMBLEN COUNTY and others
Frank Rivera v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 10-1227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, JEFFREY BEARD, LOUIS FOLINO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
