Cases 51 - 60 of 76
Auguste v. Clarke et al
as 2:2013cv01234
Plaintiff:
Bernard Vernon Auguste
Defendant:
Terri L Clarke, Brian Rees, J Justin McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson #172898 v. Sanchez
as 1:2013cv00545
Plaintiff:
Darryl A. Robinson #172898
Defendant:
Unknown Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ralph Chapa v. Joseph Arpaio, et al
as 13-15508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH JOHN CHAPA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, named as Joe Arpaio, Sheriff Maricopa County, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, FULTON BROCK and others
Chapa v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2012cv02482
Plaintiff:
Ralph John Chapa
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Fulton Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Halloran v. Thomas et al
as 2:2012cv02443
Plaintiff:
Peter Halloran
Defendant:
Todd Thomas, Shari Kimoto, John Ioane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Halloran v. Thomas et al
as 1:2012cv00553
Plaintiff:
Peter Halloran
Defendant:
Todd Thomas, Shari Kimoto, John Ioane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Cahill v. St. Louis County Jail, et al
as 12-2558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin Cahill
Defendant - Appellee:
St. Louis County Jail, Keith Morgan, Records and Unknown Sanchez, Caseworker
Cahill v. St. Louis County Jail et al
as 4:2012cv00677
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cahill
Defendant:
St. Louis County Jail, Keith Morgan and Unknown Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cahill v. St. Louis County Justice Center et al
as 4:2012cv00059
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cahill
Defendant:
St. Louis County Justice Center, Brian Herschbay, Unknown Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mapp v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2011cv01291
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lewis Mapp
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio and Unknown Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
