Cases 61 - 70 of 349
Davis v. Weirich et al
as 2:2014cv02531
Plaintiff:
Lugene Davis
Defendant:
Amy P. Weirich and J P Vincent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald B Williams v. J. P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2014cv04005
Defendant:
Leeroy Baca, California Department of Corrections, Steven Cooley and others
Plaintiff:
Donald B Williams
USA v. John Newton
as 14-10603
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN PATRICK NEWTON, also known as J. P.
YOUNG v. ALLEN et al
as 7:2014cv00044
Plaintiff:
DAMON YOUNG
Defendant:
MARTY ALLEN, CALVIN ORR, S EMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Maryland Correctional Training Center et al
as 1:2014cv00681
Plaintiff:
David M. Montgomery
Defendant:
Maryland Correctional Training Center, J. P. Morgan, T. Richer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. J. P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2014cv00959
Plaintiff:
Donald B. Williams
Defendant:
J. P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Washington Mutual Bank, Lawrence W. Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry Boggs, Jr. v. Shawn Emmons, et al
as 14-10138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY LEE BOGGS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SHAWN EMMONS and J. P. MILLER, Chaplain
BOGGS v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2013cv00167
Plaintiff:
HARRY LEE BOGGS, JR
Defendant:
SHAWN EMMONS and J. P. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Union Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2013cv01504
Plaintiff:
Larry Williams
Defendant:
Union Correctional Institution, R. E. Manning, W. L. Cardinal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Stack, Jr. v. Outstanding Marine
as 13-2471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS FRANCIS STACK, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
OUTSTANDING MARINE, JAMES E. STACK, COLONEL GEORGE JOHNSON, MD/DNR and others
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND and MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, (Police)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
