Cases 61 - 70 of 246
Constantine v. Gonzales
as 3:2007cv01538
Petitioner:
Ivor Constantine
Respondent:
Alberto R. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv02678
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Sim v. Gonzales
as 2:2007cv01581
Petitioner:
Sarob Sim
Respondent:
Alberto R. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Seng v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv01262
Petitioner:
Em Seng
Respondent:
Alberto R Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and A Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02158
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ngo v. Gonzales
as 2:2007cv01548
Petitioner:
Thanh Minh Ngo
Respondent:
Alberto R. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv04544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nikbakhsh-Tali v. Long, et al
as 2:2007cv01526
Petitioner:
Esfandiar Nikbakhsh-Tali
Respondent:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Thomas Long, Phillip Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barnes v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv01176
Petitioner:
Michael Trent Barnes
Respondent:
Alberto R. Gonzales and Charlie A. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
