Cases 61 - 70 of 339
David G. Mountford v. The People of California
as 2:2019cv08723
Respondent:
The People of California
Petitioner:
David G. Mountford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ahmadi v. Davis et al
as 4:2019cv03260
Defendant:
David G Gutierrez, Lorie Davis and Charley Valdez
Petitioner:
Ahmadi Reza
Plaintiff:
Reza Ahmadi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lincoln v. Lincoln et al
as 1:2019cv00933
Defendant:
Carly B. Lincoln, Robert Lopresti and Hon. Ellen R Greenberg
Plaintiff:
David G. Lincoln
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Landry et al
as 5:2019cv00928
Defendant:
Meskia Smith Creel, Wilbert Pyor, Brady Dennis O'Callahan and others
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Dennis Ray Davis, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonano v. Costello et al
as 9:2019cv00671
Defendant:
C.O. Mr. R. Chapin, Sgt. Vincent A. Costello, C.O. Keith Vincent and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Bonano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gutierrez v. Gutierrez et al
as 1:2019cv00553
Respondent:
David G. Gutierrez and Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Orlando M Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gutierrez v. Gutierrez et al
as 3:2019cv01163
Petitioner:
Orlando Gutierrez and Orlando M Gutierrez
Respondent:
David G Gutierrez, TDCJ Director and Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baker v. Franklin Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2019cv00581
Defendant:
Chad Lee and Franklin Parish Detention Center
Plaintiff:
David G Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2019cv00078
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
David G. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kruger v. Lauer et al
as 1:2019cv00156
Defendant:
Don Lauer, David G Cserep, Gabidiel Quintana and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Kruger
Not Yet Classified:
Daniel Sigler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
