Cases 61 - 70 of 2,038
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01647
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nelson v. Day
as 23-30616
Petitioner / Appellant:
Glen Dale Nelson
Respondent / Appellee:
Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Gayston v. Hamilton Annex Correctional Institution
as 3:2023cv01042
Plaintiff:
Glen Gayston
Defendant:
Hamilton Annex Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley, Timothy v. Bennett, Glen et al
as 3:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Timothy Talley
Defendant:
Glen E. Bennett and Mary L. McLeod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Alexander
as 23-10843
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rudolfo Gill
Defendant / Appellee:
Wade Alexander, Jordan Unit Assistant Warden, Antonious Flanagan, Captain, Carlos Mendoza, Lieutenant and others
OELER v. CHAVARA et al
as 2:2023cv01449
Plaintiff:
GLEN DAVID OELER
Defendant:
KARLA CHAVARA, WESTMORELAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, WESTMORELAND COUNTY JUDGE OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sedlacek v. Rardin
as 2:2023cv11899
Petitioner:
Glen Arlan Sedlacek
Respondent:
United States of America and Eric Rardin
Moss v. Younkin et al
as 7:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Defendant:
Glen Younkin, John S. Edwards, R. Creigh Deeds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Wise
as 23-20339
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald Lloyd Davis, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Glen L. Wise, James D. Geddes and others
Davis v. Wise
as 23-20331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald Lloyd Davis, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Glen L. Wise, James D. Geddes, Paul K. Reilley and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
