Cases 61 - 70 of 509
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01962
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Perry v. Franklin et al
as 3:2023cv01119
Plaintiff:
Donald Perry
Defendant:
Melissa Franklin, Internal Revenue Service, Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Donald McCray
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Donald McCray
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Jerome B. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Annamalai et al v. Reynolds et al
as 3:2023cv01210
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai, Parvathi Sivanadiyan and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Jacqueline H. Reynolds, Nathan Ravichandran, Viswanathan Lakshmanan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McCoy et al v. IRS
as 4:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
Hickory McCoy and Marinda Heflin
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maestas v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Maestas
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) McCoy et al v. IRS
as 2:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Hickory McCoy and Marinda Heflin
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00068
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
