Cases 61 - 70 of 128
Scott v. Handy et al
as 4:2016cv00189
Plaintiff:
John Scott
Defendant:
Patrick Handy, Melinda Perkins, Heinleg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. McMahon et al
as 5:2016ct03075
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Defendant:
Ed McMahon, Jeffrey Rohena and John Doe Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Scott v. Billy Pierce, et al
as 15-20593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLY PIERCE, Chaplain-Director-Texas Deprtment of Criminal Justice, AKBAR SHABAZZ, Chaplain-Texas Deprtment of Criminal Justice, KEITH THEDFORD, Chaplain-Texas Deprtment of Criminal Justice and others
Anthony Archuleta v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv04695
Plaintiff:
Anthony Archuleta
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Anthony Archuleta v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv03801
Plaintiff:
Anthony Archuleta
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Price et al v. Management & Training Corp. et al
as 3:2015cv00632
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp. , Neil Turner and John Does
Plaintiff:
George Price , Andre L. Vidales , Lawrence T Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Larry Charles Cleveland v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2015cv01399
Defendant:
B Avalos, LeRoy Baca, Sergeant Ceci Barajas and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Charles Cleveland
Espinosa v. Bannister et al
as 3:2014cv00668
Defendant:
Robert Bannister, James G. Cox, William Donnelly and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin W. Espinosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Vincent Ferrarini v. Sheriff John Scott
as 2:2014cv08621
Petitioner:
Daniel Vincent Ferrarini
Respondent:
Sheriff John Scott
Tedric Thomas v. John Scott et al
as 2:2014cv08574
Defendant:
Jerry Brown and Sheriff John Scott
Plaintiff:
Tedric Thomas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
