Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Carr v. MDOC et al
as 4:2015cv00120
Plaintiff:
Michael Carr
Defendant:
MDOC, Paul Madubuonwo, Robert Meacham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Mutti et al
as 1:2015cv00183
Plaintiff:
Michael Carr
Defendant:
Stephanie Mutti, Fulton County Georgia and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Clark
as 13-3840
Appellee:
Brian Fischer, Commissioner of N.Y.S.D.O.C.C.S., Joey Dishaw, Correctional Officer, Jerry Hebert, Sergeant and others
Defendant:
Brian LeClair, Correctional Officer, John Doe, 1 - 2 Investigator of I.G. Offices N.Y.S.D.O.C.C.S., Michael Carr, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff:
John White
White v. Clark et al
as 9:2012cv00986
Plaintiff:
John H. White
Defendant:
Jeffrey Clark, Shawn C. Conto, Michael Sisto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Michael Carr
as 11-30750
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL CARR
Kendrick Butler v. Sheriff Fisher, et al
as 10-2135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kendrick Butler
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheriff Fisher, of Fayette County, Charles Piquar, Jail Administrator, Supervisor Thyrin and others
Allen Huenefeld v. Michael Carr, et al
as 10-1780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Allen Huenefeld
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Carr and Bill Elam
Carr v. USA
as 2:2009cv07012
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
David Estrada v. James Reed, et al
as 08-4080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ESTRADA
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES REED, MICHAEL CARR, VIRGINIA JONES and others
Adefeyinti v. Federal Bureau of Prisons/Federal Correctional Institution Oxford, WI et al
as 3:2008cv00426
Plaintiff:
Adekunle Razaq Adefeyinti
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons/Federal Correctional Institution Oxford, WI, JAMES REED and MICHAEL CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
