Cases 61 - 70 of 2,421
(HC) Ramos v. Lemon
as 1:2023cv01707
Petitioner:
Gavino Cirilo Ramos
Respondent:
Tristan Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yates v. Skinner et al
as 4:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Duane Yates
Defendant:
Beth Skinner, William Sperfslage, Shawn Howard and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolton v. Ramos
as 1:2023cv10657
Petitioner:
Eric T. Bolton
Respondent:
Acting Warden Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gonzales v. Madden et al
as 3:2023cv02181
Plaintiff:
Helidoro S. Gonsales and Helidoro S Gonzales
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, S. Gates, S. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacob Gibbs v. Mckay et al
as 9:2023cv81511
Plaintiff:
Jacob Gibbs
Defendant:
Rodney Mckay, Elizer Ramos, Joseph Milone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Roderick Washington v. Alex Villanueva et al
as 2:2023cv09836
Plaintiff:
Roderick Washington
Defendant:
Alex Villanueva, Steinert, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00527
Petitioner:
Luis Ramos
Respondent:
Mark Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Armstrong #314416 v. Ramos et al
as 2:2023cv02401
Plaintiff:
Kpou Armstrong
Defendant:
Alfred Ramos, Fransisco Hernandez and Mia Baldenegro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. McAdorey et al
as 4:2023cv00490
Petitioner:
Netzahualcoyotl G Ramos
Respondent:
John McAdorey and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
