Cases 61 - 70 of 634
USA v. Orosco
as 22-40384
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Maria Del Rasario Orosco, also known as Maria Del Rosario Orozco, also known as Fluve, also known as Fluje, also known as Rochi, also known as Maria
Valle-Rosario v. Institucion Guerrero No. 304
as 3:2022cv01264
Plaintiff:
Wendell Noel Valle-Rosario
Defendant:
Institucion Guerrero No. 304
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rosario v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Jose Rosario
Defendant:
J. Cook, G. Ralston and J. Rivello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosario v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2022fp00175
Petitioner:
Ivan Rosario
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1342
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rosario v. Doe
as 3:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Allen Rosario
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. The City of New York Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv02958
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
The City of New York Department of Corrections, Supreme Court Judge Clancy, Eli Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myron Tobler v. G Rosario, et al
as 22-10833
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYRON TOBLER
Defendant / Appellee:
G ROSARIO, S LYON and T WHITE
Keith Rosario v. Edward Strawn, et al
as 22-1312
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH ROSARIO
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD STRAWN, Warden, DEVYN BREESE, Counselor, CAPTAIN RESTANIO and others
(PC)Bangura v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
Abdul Bangura
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. Isho, C. Dennie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
