Cases 61 - 70 of 215
DIAZ v. CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC et al
as 5:2016cv00318
Plaintiff:
SCOTTY SANTOS DIAZ
Defendant:
CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC , HERNANDEZ PEREZ , B BOTTOMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Centurion of Florida LLC et al
as 6:2016cv01950
Plaintiff:
Scotty Santos Diaz
Defendant:
Centurion of Florida LLC, Dr. Hernandez Perez, M.D., B. Bottoms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cohen v. Tinsley et al
as 1:2016cv03169
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cohen
Defendant:
John Tinsley and Regulatory Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tinsley v. California Health Care Services et al
as 2:2016cv01980
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Tinsley
Defendant:
California Health Care Services and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell Tinsley v. Merrill Main, et al
as 16-3320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL TINSLEY, and on behalf of residents at STU in similar situation problems, et
Defendant - Appellee:
MERRILL MAIN, STU Clinical Director, SHERRY YATES, Department of Corrections, SHANTAY BRAIM ADAMS, Unit Director and others
Tinsley v. Fox et al.
as 2:2016cv01647
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Tinsley
Defendant:
Robert Fox, C. Tileston and V. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tinsley v. Wexford Health Source
as 1:2016cv02526
Plaintiff:
Wendell V. Tinsley
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TINSLEY v. OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER et al
as 2:2016cv04102
Petitioner:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Respondent:
OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and SHERRY YATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TINSLEY v. YATES et al
as 2:2016cv04078
Petitioner:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Respondent:
SHERRY YATES and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tinsley v. USA
as 1:2016cv00778
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kevin Tinsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
