Cases 61 - 70 of 115
Whitt v. Zimmerman et al
as 5:2015cv05224
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Whitt
Defendant:
Arkasnas Department of Human Services (DHS), Shallen Carrol, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wicks v. Halstead et al
as 3:2015cv01072
Plaintiff:
David Bryant Wicks
Defendant:
Shane Halstead, Wal-Mart Department Store, Ashley I. Riggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv05205
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Knox
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and John or Jane Doe Loss Prevention Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WICKS v. WAL-MART DEPT. STORE MANAGER et al
as 1:2015cv00269
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant:
WAL-MART DEPT. STORE MANAGER, LAMAR SKELTON, CONCORD POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bullard v. Gonzalez et al
as 0:2015cv60038
Plaintiff:
Damien Bullard
Defendant:
Wilfredo Gonzalez, Andrew Clark, Jessy Fair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Spoon et al
as 3:2014cv03456
Plaintiff:
Blaine Alan Payne
Defendant:
Jacob Spoon, Police Dept City of West Monroe, Wal-Mart of West Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks et al v. Nett et al
as 5:2014cv00983
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks, Spence Taylor and John Michael
Defendant:
Elizabeth Nett, Ralph Shrader, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Wal Mart (745)
as 4:2014cv00688
Plaintiff:
Jodie Dale Wiggins, Jr
Defendant:
Wal Mart (745)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiggins v. Wal Mart
as 4:2014cv00648
Petitioner:
Jodie Dale Wiggins, Jr
Respondent:
Wal Mart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reeves v. Altum, et al
as 5:2014cv00245
Defendant:
Chris Altum, Loss Prevention and Wal-Mart
Plaintiff:
Lea Gene Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
