Cases 61 - 70 of 1,183
Riggs v. Wiley
as 1:2022cv06015
Plaintiff:
Clay Landis Riggs
Defendant:
Anastasia Staci Wiley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Stitt et al
as 4:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Jesse Michael Wayne Jackson
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Officer DeShields, Officer Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2022cv00170
Petitioner:
HAROLD UNYULA SMITH, SR
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA and SHERIFF WILEY GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blanton v. Blair et al
as 3:2022cv02350
Plaintiff:
Donald Gene Blanton
Defendant:
Casey Blair, Erleigh Norville Wiley and Sharon Keller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayes #793413 v. Schroeder et al
as 2:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Wiley Gregory Mayes #793413
Defendant:
Sarah Schroeder, George Wood, Unknown Bedient and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanton v. Lumpkin
as 22-10959
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald Gene Blanton
Defendant / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Norville Wiley
Wiley v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01049
Petitioner:
Christopher D. Wiley
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-30601
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Griffin v. Wiley et al
as 8:2022cv02159
Plaintiff:
Andy Griffin
Defendant:
Corporal Wiley, Deputy Statsny, Corporal Brinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Voits v. Brown et al
as 2:2022cv01365
Defendant:
Mss. Kelcie Main, Mss. Kate Brown, Shemia Fagan and others
Plaintiff:
Ivar Voits
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
