Cases 61 - 70 of 103
Smith v. Wallace et al
as 4:2012cv01391
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Sydney Wallace, James F. Kanatzar, Michael W Hanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Witcher v. Warden
as 1:2012cv03085
Petitioner:
Wayman N. Witcher
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry Smith v. James Kanatzar, et al
as 12-3040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
James F. Kanatzar, Jackson County Prosecuting Attorney, Peggy Stevens-McGraw, Judge, Jeffrey Gedbaw, Jackson County Public Defender and others
Smith v. Wallace et al
as 4:2012cv01068
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Sydney Wallace, Peggy Stevens-McGraw, Michael W Hanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannah v. Mardavich et al
as 7:2012cv00332
Defendant:
C/O Caldwell, Capt. Davis, Frank E. Mardavich and others
Plaintiff:
Derwin Kendall Hannah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Smith v. James Kanatzar, et al
as 12-2713
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
James F. Kanatzar, Prosecuting Attorney, Peggy Stevens-McGraw, Judge, Jeffrey Gedbaw, Public Defender and others
Hannah v. Mardavich et al
as 7:2012cv00320
Defendant:
C/O Caldwell, Capt. Davis, Frank E. Mardavich and others
Plaintiff:
Derwin Kendall Hannah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Smith v. Sydney Wallace, et al
as 12-2588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Sydney Wallace, Peggy Stevens McGraw, Jeffrey Gedbaw and others
Smith v. Kanatzar et al
as 4:2012cv00799
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
James F. Kanatzar, Peggy Stevens-McGraw, Jeffrey Gedbaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witcher v. USA
as 1:2012cv00192
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Derrick L Witcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
