Cases 71 - 80 of 1,842
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LIEUTENANT BARNES and others
Watkins v. Stevens et al
as 2:2023cv01563
Petitioner:
Derrick Watkins
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens, Dept of Correction, Brian Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harper v. Segal et al
as 0:2023cv03468
Plaintiff:
Kelly Harper
Defendant:
Warden Michael Segal, Susan Brown, Associate Warden Vaught and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Smith, Jr. v. Daniel Shue, et al
as 23-3435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Abraham Smith, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Daniel Shue, Prosecuting Attorney, Sebastian County, Barret Milam, Prosecuting Attorney, Sebastian County, City of Fort Smith, Arkansas/Greenwood District and others
Burns v. City of Yonkers et al
as 1:2023cv09787
Plaintiff:
George Burns
Defendant:
City of Yonkers, County of Westchester, Captain Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall Watkins v. Lieutenant Seabrook
as 23-7091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL LEON WATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT SEABROOK
Watkins v. Morgan
as 5:2023cv01473
Petitioner:
Jessie James Watkins
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WATKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2023cv00268
Petitioner:
ERNEST WATKINS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2023cv02468
Plaintiff:
Joseph Watkins
Defendant:
Sheriff Bob Gualtieri, Detective Nathan Leathers, Detective Eric S. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Beamer
as 3:2023cv01568
Plaintiff:
James Watkins
Defendant:
Doctor Beamer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
