Cases 71 - 80 of 96
Freeman v. Apker
as 4:2012cv00635
Petitioner:
James Andrew Freeman
Respondent:
Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James Brinkley v. Yuba County Superior Court
as 12-16722
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ANDREW BRINKLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
YUBA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Doria v. Nappi et al
as 2:2012cv00575
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Doria
Defendant:
Arno Nappi, S. Leatherman and K Shiller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Freeman v. Craig Apker
as 12-15347
Petitioner - Appellee:
JAMES ANDREW FREEMAN
Respondent - Appellant:
CRAIG APKER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00386
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
James Campbell v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 12-10082
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ANDREW CAMPBELL
Respondent - Appellee:
FCI COLEMAN MEDIUM WARDEN
Dye v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv01147
Petitioner:
James Andrew Dye
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jay Nottingham v. Joel Richardson, et al
as 11-11027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY ANTHONY NOTTINGHAM, also known as Sterling Harrison, also known as James Andrew Armstrong, also known as Jay Thrasher, also known as Hunter O'Brian, also known as Jay A. Notingham, also known as Jay Anthony Nuttingham, also known as Jay Anthony Mottin
Defendant - Appellee:
JOEL RICHARDSON, Sheriff Randall County, TIM LACEY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - Medical Contractor for Randall County Sheriff's Department, SCOTT DAVIS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - Medical Department of Randall County Sheriff's Department and others
Gray v. Kereste
as 11-3545
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ANDREW GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN KERESTES, ET AL.
McDowell v. Ham et al (INMATE2)
as 1:2011cv00543
Plaintiff:
Oscar Prentice McDowell
Defendant:
Edward Ham, Jimmy Smith, James Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
