Cases 71 - 80 of 190
JOHNSON v. KIANI et al
as 1:2015cv01036
Defendant:
KELLY COUNCELLER and DR. KIANI
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2015cv00799
Defendant:
BOND, A. COLE, CONNORS and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2015cv00930
Defendant:
Charge Nurse Clark County Detention Center, Clark County Detention Center, Marshall - Clark County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2015cv00746
Defendant:
ANDREW COLE, COOPERRIDER, CRISTAL and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Johnson v. G. David, et al
as 15-10423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
G. S. DAVID, Warden, MARK ROTH, Regional Director and WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Niebla v. Attorney General, State of Florida et al
as 8:2015cv01162
Plaintiff:
Jorge L. Niebla
Defendant:
Attorney General, State of Florida, Richard A. Johnson, T. Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Mathieson
as 3:2015cv00203
Petitioner:
Richard Lamont Johnson
Respondent:
Robert Mathieson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Niebla v. Johnson
as 8:2015cv00771
Plaintiff:
Jorge L. Niebla
Defendant:
Richard A. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. David et al
as 2:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
G S David, Mark Roth and W Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 2:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
Deana R Davis and NFN Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
