Cases 71 - 80 of 1,625
Meinke et al v. Stammitti et al
as 1:2023cv01175
Plaintiff:
Nolan P. Meinke and Jose Romero
Defendant:
Sheriff Philip R. Stammitti, Captain Hammond Jack, Administrator James Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Roper v. Stanford et al
as 1:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Jason Roper
Defendant:
Jon Stanford, Wade Miller and Issac Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phifer v. Boncoskey et al
as 2:2023cv01027
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Phifer
Defendant:
Scott Boncoskey, Todd P Romero, Office of Public Defender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Romero v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01068
Petitioner:
Martin Arreola Romero
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hernandez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv01215
Petitioner:
Carlos Romero Hernandez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hernandez v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00270
Petitioner:
Carlos Romero Hernandez
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) O'Connor v. Romero
as 2:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Glenn O'Connor
Defendant:
C. Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramon Romero v. Mindi Nurse
as 23-1906
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAMON ROMERO
Respondent / Appellee:
MINDI NURSE
Romero Thomas v. Douglas Smith, et al
as 23-1430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROMERO MONTE THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS SMITH, Deputy Warden, JEREMY HOWARD, Assistant Deputy Warden, MICHELLE L. PARSONS, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
Taylor v. Allen et al
as 2:2023cv00694
Plaintiff:
Joshua Louis Taylor
Defendant:
Patrick Allen, Kate Brown, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
