Cases 71 - 80 of 594
DUNN v. TOBY
as 1:2022cv01063
Petitioner:
DARIUS JARRELL DUNN
Respondent:
Annette Toby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUNN v. TOBY
as 5:2022cv00108
Petitioner:
DARIUS JARRELL DUNN
Respondent:
ANNETTE TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pronin v. Penry et al
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Dmitry Pronin
Defendant:
S Penry, FNU Van Ness, FNU Tenner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00085
Petitioner:
Toby Williams
Defendant:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Derrick Estell v. Walter Washington, et al
as 22-1411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Derrick Estell
Defendant / Appellee:
Walter Washington, Lieutenant, Varner SuperMax, Jonathan Martin, Captain, Varner SuperMax, Douglas E. Boultinghouse, Lieutenant, Varner SuperMax and others
Lopez v. Williamson
as 1:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
Johnny J. Lopez
Defendant:
M. (I) Walters and Toby Williamson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00213
Petitioner:
Toby Williams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stangel v. Wead
as 1:2022cv00067
Petitioner:
Toby Stangel
Respondent:
Warden Shawn Wead
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Howard et al
as 4:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Troy Williams
Defendant:
Woody Howard, Robert Mays, Jimmy Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darden v. Vines et al
as 6:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
O'Neil J Darden, Jr
Defendant:
Robert C Vines, April Wyatt, Melissa Darden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
