Cases 81 - 90 of 241
Hollinquest v. Payne
as 2:2017cv01423
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Steve Franke, J. Gilmore and others
Plaintiff:
Dasay Hollinquest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saracina v. New York State et al
as 9:2017cv00864
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Saracina
Defendant:
New York State, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Dale G. Dubrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Behl v. Peters et al
as 8:2017cv01749
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Behl, Sr.
Defendant:
R. Timothy Peters, Christina T. Helinger, Darryl C. Casanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. GRAY et al
as 1:2017cv02439
Defendant:
D. DAVIS, L. GRAY, C. MILLER and others
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE J. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Taylor v. USA
as 17-12740
Petitioner - Appellant:
MATTHEW J. TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TAYLOR v. SOMMERS et al
as 2:2017cv02621
Petitioner:
GEORGE J. TAYLOR, III
Respondent:
JACK SOMMERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthews v. Hascall et al
as 2:2017cv00785
Defendant:
Brian Belleque, Kim Brockamp, City of Pendleton, County of Umatilla, OR and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karl Hall v. State of Oregon, et al
as 17-35422
Petitioner - Appellant:
KARL MORGAN HALL
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON and J. TAYLOR
Pryor v. Penzone et al
as 2:2017cv01276
Plaintiff:
Brian William Pryor
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Jeffrey J Alvarez, Paul Hilmo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Polizzi et al
as 9:2017cv00377
Plaintiff:
William D. Thomas
Defendant:
Polizzi, Louis Pingotti, Jamie M. LaManna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
