Cases 81 - 90 of 389
Moore v. Bugher et al
as 6:2022cv01472
Plaintiff:
Gordon Talbert Moore
Defendant:
Joe Bugher, Dr. Warren Roberts, Tia Bullock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. LaValley et al
as 9:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vargas
Defendant:
LaValley, C.O. Kelly, Duray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monaco v. John Doe (1) et al
as 2:2022cv02888
Plaintiff:
Jason David Monaco
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naydenov v. Doe, et al
as 1:2022cv03527
Plaintiff:
Andre Naydenov
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Benzing et al
as 3:2022cv01389
Plaintiff:
Antwon D. Jenkins
Defendant:
Kenny Benzing, John/Jane Doe 1, John/Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DOBY v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2022cv03011
Plaintiff:
DAVID DOBY
Defendant:
SGT. JOHN DOE #1, OFC. A. RODRIGUEZ, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daise v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Travis Daise
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, John/Jane Doe 1, John/Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson et al v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson, Floyd Parker, Jermaine Murphy and others
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Daniel Monti, A Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cullum v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
Detrick Cullum
Defendant:
Tiffanie Clark, Cherryle Hinthorne, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
