Cases 81 - 90 of 21,869
Steven L. Harris v. Chantell Jewell
as 24-1999
Petitioner:
STEVEN L. HARRIS
Respondent:
CHANTELL JEWELL
YOUNG v. BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv00990
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RAY YOUNG
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL and BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY SHERRIFFS DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. McKenzie et al
as 0:2024cv00059
Defendant:
Unknown Fannin, Shaun McKenzie, Ricky Bear and others
Plaintiff:
Brett Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonilla v. Santa Clara County Superior Court
as 4:2024cv03537
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Santa Clara County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. San Benito County Superior Court, its Judges and Court Clerk's Office
as 4:2024cv03534
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
San Benito County Superior Court, its Judges and Court Clerk's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2024cv03533
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Perkins
as 4:2024cv05058
Petitioner:
Dakota Edward Stevens
Respondent:
Jeffrey Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Girtler v. Stevens
as 2:2024cv00727
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Girtler
Respondent:
C Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Bonilla v. Fresno County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01637
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Fresno County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Oklahoma Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Terry Morrow
Defendant:
Oklahoma Board of County Commissioners, Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Steven Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
