Cases 1 - 10 of 362
Wayne v. Hawes et al
as 7:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Robert James Wayne
Defendant:
Spencer Hawes, Kyle Irving, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Armstrong
as 24-50016
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jones
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Earl Helmer, Treyvon Hocutt and others
Caupp v. Hawes
as 3:2023cv00309
Petitioner:
Matthew Christopher Caupp
Respondent:
Captain Hawes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hawes v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Gary E. Hawes
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, NDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawes v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2023cv00052
Petitioner:
Shawn Hawes
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hawes v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01219
Petitioner:
Richard Vonzell Hawes
Respondent:
Warden FNU Almonza and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frye v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00655
Plaintiff:
Devon Frye
Defendant:
Nelson Smith, Dr. William McKenna, Dr. Daniel Mondaldi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marwan Halls v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 22-2775
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARWAN HALLS and MARWAN HAWES, AKA Marwan Halls
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
McGee v. McKenzie et al
as 6:2022cv00978
Plaintiff:
Rickey L. McGee
Defendant:
T. McKenzie, Ms FNU Wright, Jennifer Coalston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Armstrong, et al.
as 5:2022cv00898
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jones
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Earl Helmer, Treyvon Hocutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
