Cases 1 - 10 of 159
HYDE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN MICHAEL HYDE
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATIONS and ANGELA LILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Younger et al v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Sharon Huddleston, Kora L. Liles, Kimberley Younger and others
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Jeff Zmuda and Donna Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liles v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00563
Petitioner:
Dylan Michael Liles
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
HYDE v. FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN MICHAEL HYDE
Defendant:
ANGELA LILES and FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liles (ID 122198) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03070
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Aramark Food Service and Donna Hook
Plaintiff:
Kora L. Liles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Medina, et al
as 24-1129
Plaintiff:
JACK L. MILLER, III
Defendant:
SERGEANT MEDINA and SERGEANT LILES
Liles v. Bledsoe County Correctional Complex
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Liles
Defendant:
Bledsoe County Correctional Complex, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex - Medical Department, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex - Dental and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reginald Liles v. Brittany Edwards
as 23-7006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REGINALD M. LILES
Defendant / Appellee:
BRITTANY P. EDWARDS, Assistant District Attorney sued in their individual capacity
LILES v. EDWARDS
as 1:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
REGINALD M. LILES
Defendant:
BRITTANY P. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LILES v. EDWARDS
as 1:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
REGINALD MAURICE LILES
Defendant:
BRITTANY P. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
