Cases 1 - 10 of 1,204
McMullan v. Tanner et al
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
William B. McMullan
Defendant:
Joel Tanner, Shane Bozeman, William Barrett and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Wilson et al
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Dan Wilson, Drew Corwin, Tanner Corwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tanner v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Kelly Tanner
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Ken Williams, C. Cass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tabitha McKenzie v. Chief Judge, et al
as 24-11666
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE, CASEY T. BARREN and LISA TANNER
Tabitha McKenzie v. Chief Judge, et al
as 24-11667
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE, CASEY T. BARREN and LISA TANNER
James v. E Baton Rouge City Prsh
as 24-30318
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James, real party in interest Conner A. James
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge City Parish, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Joshua Clark and others
Perry v. Tanner
as 1:2024cv11346
Petitioner:
Casey Hayes Perry
Respondent:
Michigan, State of and Jeff Tanner
Hedrick v. Morrsey et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Tanner Ray Hedrick
Defendant:
Patrick Morrsey, William K. Marshell, III, Shelby O. Searls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv11304
Plaintiff:
Rodney D. Rogers
Defendant:
Jeff Tanner, Wayne Thomas, II, L. Brydie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Annabel, II v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1425
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, official and personal capacity, named as Heidi Washington, JEREMY BUSH, Deputy Director, official and personal capacity, ASSISTANT DEPUTY WARDEN MCKINNEY, official and personal capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
