Cases 1 - 10 of 1,633
Soto, Jose v. Staneic et al
as 3:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Jose Soto, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Staneic, CO II Billy, Sgt. Beahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2024cv01366
Plaintiff:
Jermorrow Jerry Hendrix
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Unknown Figueroa and Fernando Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Soto
as 3:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Kyle Chandler
Defendant:
Michael Soto and J Mathey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto v. Barner et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Darius Jason Soto
Defendant:
Reginald Barner, Morgan Stephenson, Eric Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Soto v. Sacramento Main Jail et al
as 2:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
William Soto
Defendant:
Sacramento Main Jail and Sacramento RCCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv05025
Petitioner:
Kyle Garrett Soto
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Charles Daniels v. Cortena et al
as 2:2024cv03374
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels
Defendant:
Cortena, Soto and Guevarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto-Guzman v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01017
Petitioner:
Jose Miguel Soto-Guzman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Davis v. CoreCivic Enterprise & Authorities et al
as 2:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Zdenek Davis
Defendant:
CoreCivic Enterprise & Authorities, USMS Agents of Nevada, Investigator McCulloch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogelio Soto v. Brian Birkholz
as 2:2024cv02709
Petitioner:
Rogelio Soto
Respondent:
Brian Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
