Cases 1 - 10 of 31,791
Brown v. Doughtry et al
as 2:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Keenan F Brown
Defendant:
Dr Barry T Doughtry, Dr Jane Doe and Baier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy Rindahl v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Ex-Secretary of Health, Joan Adam, Interim Secretary of Health, Kristi Noem, Governor for the State of South Dakota and others
MCMILLIAN v. JONES et al
as 4:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
XAVIER T MCMILLIAN
Defendant:
DELDRON JONES, BRANDON GRANGER and ISAAC REDDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dr. Collins et al
as 3:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Collins, Dr. A. Acevedo, Michelle Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Perez-Lugo et al
as 3:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Daontae T. Scott
Defendant:
E. Perez-Lugo, Christina Crews, R. Bassa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. GIELOW et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
W GIELOW, K PERKINS, J STREIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
JAMES T MURZIKE
Defendant:
C T HUGHES, K PERKINS, S SPEARS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrell Ainsworth v. T. Macias et al
as 2:2024cv04173
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Ainsworth
Defendant:
T. Macias, Dr. Gray, McGowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LILLARD v. RULE et al
as 2:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
COREY LILLARD
Respondent:
T. RULE and WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ackerman v. Rigney et al
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Curtis Rigney, T. Phelps, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
