Cases 1 - 10 of 1,635
Sanchez, Jr, Fernando v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv22258
Plaintiff:
Fernando Sanchez, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hendrix v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2024cv01366
Plaintiff:
Jermorrow Jerry Hendrix
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Unknown Figueroa and Fernando Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Womack v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00658
Petitioner:
Christian Dior Womack
Respondent:
United States of America
Defendant:
Warden Fernando Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fernando Miguel De Oliveira v. CDCR-California Institution for Women et al
as 5:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Fernando Miquel De Oliveira
Defendant:
CDCR-California Institution for Women, L. Parker, Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mejia v. Muro
as 0:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Fernando Tello Mejia
Defendant:
Richard Muro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Keast et al
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Fernando Rodriguez
Defendant:
John Keast, Benson, J. Issacson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Napa State Hospital et al
as 4:2024cv02943
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Price
Defendant:
Napa State Hospital and Fernando Cortez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nash v. Pacheco et al
as 1:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Phillip Nash
Defendant:
Lauren Pacheco, Debney Jaramillo, Gabriel Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01084
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sanchez-Gonzalez v. USA
as 3:2024cv01121
Petitioner:
Fernando Sanchez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
