Cases 1 - 10 of 64
TAYLOR v. PLATT et al
as 2:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRETT TAYLOR
Defendant:
DAVID PLATT, OJO, EMMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. EMMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MARTIN
Defendant:
DAVID EMMERSON, CENTURION MEDICAL STAFF, OJO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Ojo et al
as 5:2023ct03363
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
A. Odu, N. Harris, J. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEGGS v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2023cv01718
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT LEGGS
Defendant:
EMERSON, CENTURION HEALTH, INC. and OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal-Williams v. Daramy et al
as 1:2023cv02166
Plaintiff:
Rodjaun Neal-Williams
Defendant:
Officer Daramy, Officer Ndoh, Sergeant Ojo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BEELER v. OJO et al
as 1:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
RUSTY ALLEN BEELER
Defendant:
OJO, BURLINE, RAMEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Ojo v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01096
Petitioner:
Olanrewaju Tunde Ojo
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ojo v. Decker
as 22-1641
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Olukayode Ojo
Defendant / Appellee:
H.O. Thomas Decker, Thomas E. Feeley, Robert F. Judge and others
Defendant:
John Tsoukaris, Margo Struass, Officer Anderson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
