Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Lilley et al
as 9:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Sabas Martinez
Defendant:
Lynn J. Lilley, Lefield, Captain T. Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Franklin v. A.H. Martinez et al
as 2:2021cv00991
Defendant:
J. Tingley, Correctional Officer J. Resendiz, J. Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Je. H. et al v. County of Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services
as 2:2014cv09874
In Re:
A.H., Wi. H., B.H., Jo. H., Wa. H., El. H., S.H., and Em.H.
Respondent:
Philip L. Browning and County of Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services
Petitioner:
Er. H. and Je. H.
WILLIAMS v. DECKER et al
as 1:2012cv00421
Plaintiff:
KENNETH W. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
T.P. DECKER, T.B. FURR and A.H. TOMLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Dr. Jamaludeen A.H.
as 1:2010cv01041
Plaintiff:
Damon Martin
Defendant:
Dr. Jamaludeen A.H.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edsall v. People of the State of California et al
as 2:2008cv01182
Petitioner:
John A.H. Edsall, Sr.
Respondent:
People of the State of California and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jeffrey Washington v. Paul Lanteigene
as 08-6526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY T. WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL J. LANTEIGENE, Sheriff and JAMAL U. DEEN, A.H.-MD Doctor
Edsall v. Osuna et al
as 3:2007cv00676
Plaintiff:
John A.H. Edsall, Sr.
Defendant:
Osuna, Parker, Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
