Cases 1 - 10 of 1,401
WALKER v. BUTLER et al
as 2:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WALKER
Defendant:
BRIAN BUTLER, ARAMARK, INC., ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Younger et al v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Younger, Barbara Frantz, Kora L. Liles and others
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodson v. Bouchard et al
as 4:2024cv11460
Plaintiff:
Jordan Christopher Goodson
Defendant:
Michael J. Bouchard, Oakland, County of, Wellpath and others
Ray v. Worden et al
as 3:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
William James Ray
Defendant:
T Worden, Snow, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huddleston (ID 99733) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03086
Plaintiff:
Sharon Huddleston
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Dona Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant:
ARAMARK, GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strader (ID 66677) v. (lnu) et al
as 5:2024cv03081
Plaintiff:
James C. Strader
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu), Centurion, Aramark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Le Clerc v. Waters et al
as 3:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Le Clerc, Sr.
Defendant:
Sheriff T.K. Waters, M. Clark, W. Thomas, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. World Book et al
as 6:2024cv06039
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
World Book, Nike Distribution Centers, Craig Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer (ID 126729) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Michaela Lea Spencer
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
